Industry solution

Education & EdTech

Learning signals that reach the right person while there is still time to help

Learning, advising, community, events and focus tools designed to work as one for schools, universities and bootcamps.

Products
8
Challenges
6
Concepts
15
Campus scene with an advisor's early-alert dashboard, a student community app on a phone, a focus timer and a career fair booth.
BuildMyIQ(opens BuildMyIQ in a new tab)FluidGrids(opens FluidGrids in a new tab)BigConsole(opens BigConsole in a new tab)Botlit(opens Botlit in a new tab)ComradeCircle(opens ComradeCircle in a new tab)EventfullyManaged(opens EventfullyManaged in a new tab)TechnoSpam(opens TechnoSpam in a new tab)TimeCampus(opens TimeCampus in a new tab)

The problem

Why learning institutions struggle to act on what they already know

The signal that a student is struggling, a teacher is overloaded or a graduate is job-ready usually exists already, but it sits in one system while the person who could act works in another.

Schools, universities and bootcamps run on a patchwork: a learning management system, a separate student information system, a gradebook, an advising tool, group chats students set up themselves, an events tool, a help line and a shelf of spreadsheets. Each holds part of the picture. Weeks can pass between the first missed assignment and the first conversation about it.

The people doing the work are stretched. Advisors carry large caseloads, teachers grade in the evenings because planning periods get absorbed by meetings and coverage, and enrollment offices field the same questions over and over in the weeks that matter most. Bootcamps and continuing-education programs face a different squeeze: employers want proof that graduates can do the job, and a certificate of attendance does not provide it.

Any answer also has to respect learners. Students include minors, student records deserve careful handling, and tools that feel like monitoring get rejected by the students and staff they are meant to help. Technology has to support the educator's judgment, keep people in charge of consequential decisions, and make privacy the default rather than a setting.

Who this is for

  • Provost or vice provost for student success

    Persistence in gateway courses, and seeing which cohorts and programs need support early enough to change the outcome.

  • Academic advisors and student success staff

    A caseload they can actually work: who needs outreach today, why they were flagged, and what has already been tried.

  • K-12 district and school leaders

    Timely feedback for students, protected planning time for teachers, and a safe, well-run digital environment for learners of every age.

  • Dean of students and student life teams

    Belonging for first-year, commuter and transfer students, moderated spaces that stay safe, and events people actually attend.

  • Enrollment services, registrar and financial aid

    Accurate, consistent answers in peak weeks, fewer repeat calls, and requests that arrive with the context needed to act.

  • Bootcamp and continuing-education directors

    Credible proof of skill for career changers, hiring partners who come back, and demo days that run from one record.

A day in the life

The story behind the solution

A week in October at Marlowe Ridge University

Imani Castellanos is Associate Provost for Student Success at Marlowe Ridge University, a regional university where many students commute and the continuing-education division runs a full-stack coding bootcamp. It is week six of the fall term. Midterms start next week, spring registration opens on Monday, and the bootcamp's demo day is on the calendar. This is her week, and the moments where the systems around her fall short.

  1. Monday, 7:40 am

    A report that is three weeks old

    Imani opens the weekly retention meeting with the latest early-warning report, compiled by hand from the learning platform and the gradebook. It is three weeks old. An advisor mentions Tobias, a first-year student in Calculus I whose instructor says he vanished after the first quiz. Nobody in the room knew until this morning. Imani asks how many students like Tobias there are right now. No one can say.

    How this is solved: Spotting struggling students before midterm grades post
  2. Tuesday, 3:30 pm

    Feedback that arrives after the next draft

    The director of the Writing Program stops by with the English chair from a partner high school, whose teachers also teach the university's dual-enrollment composition sections. Their problem is really about time. Essay feedback is coming back weeks after submission, long after the next draft is due, and planning periods keep getting absorbed by meetings and coverage. "My teachers are grading at midnight," the chair says, "and I cannot show anyone that without asking them to fill in timesheets."

    How this is solved: Feedback that keeps pace without eating teachers' evenings
  3. Wednesday, 12:10 pm

    The group chat that went quiet

    At lunch with the peer mentors, Imani hears the same story three times. The orientation group chats buzzed during Welcome Week and then went silent. One was shut down after a run of insults staff never saw. A commuter student in her third week says she drives in, goes to class and drives home, and has not met a single person in her major.

    How this is solved: Helping first-year and commuter students find their people
  4. Thursday, 9:00 am

    The queue before registration opens

    The enrollment services director forwards the phone queue report: waits are climbing ahead of Monday, and most calls are the same few questions about holds, withdrawal deadlines and financial aid. Last year's chatbot pilot was switched off after it quoted a withdrawal date from the previous catalog. "We need something that answers from our own policies," he writes, "and knows when to hand a student to us."

    How this is solved: Answering registration-week questions without the long hold queue
  5. Friday, 2:00 pm

    Proof, not attendance

    The bootcamp's career coach walks Imani through demo day, two weeks out: twenty-eight learners, a capstone each, a dozen hiring partners invited. The RSVPs live in a spreadsheet, booth assignments in an email thread, and the learners' evidence is spread across three sites. One hiring partner has already written: "Which of your graduates can actually build this, and how would we know?"

    How this is solved: Turning bootcamp work into proof employers can check
  6. Sunday, 11:50 pm

    Midnight in the library

    A message from the student government president arrives late. The library is full at midnight, students are facing three exams in four days, and the wellness emails are not helping anyone plan. "Please do not send us another tracking app," she adds. "Students will just turn it off." Imani reads it twice and moves it to the top of Monday's agenda.

    How this is solved: Protecting study focus and rest in exam season

None of these moments needs another stand-alone tool. Each needs a record that already exists to reach the person who can act on it, with students and staff in charge of their own data. That is the idea behind this solution concept: BuildMyIQ as the learning record, and seven other Burdenoff products each doing one part of the work on the same foundation.

Challenges and how they are solved

6 problems, several products, one connected answer

Each challenge shows the problem as it happens, how the products are designed to hand work to each other, and the concepts that illustrate it. Share any challenge on its own.

The problem

It is week six of the fall term. Tobias, a first-year student in Calculus I, last opened a lesson eleven days ago and has not submitted two problem sets. His instructor noticed, but emailing the advising office felt like overreach. His advisor carries a caseload of more than three hundred students and works from a midterm-grade report that arrives in week eight. The learning platform, the gradebook and the advising notes live in separate systems, so the first time anyone connects the dots is when a failing grade posts, or when Tobias quietly stops coming to class.

What it costs

By the time midterm grades land, the window for a low-stakes nudge has closed, gateway-course withdrawals pile up, and advisors spend the back half of the term on recovery instead of prevention.

How the products work together

BuildMyIQ is designed to hold the fine-grained signal: per-lesson progress, submissions and grades on the same record as enrollment, not a nightly sync. Those events are designed to reach FluidGrids, where the student success office keeps its early-alert logic as a versioned rule set it can test against sample cases before publishing. BuildMyIQ is also designed to let instructors raise a flag with one click from the gradebook, and that flag follows the same FluidGrids rule path to the advisor. When a rule fires, FluidGrids is designed to send the first nudge, notify the instructor and place the alert, with its evidence, on the advisor's caseload in BuildMyIQ. Every alert and its outcome is also written to a FluidGrids datasink that feeds a BigConsole retention console, where an Explain panel is designed to tell the provost's team what changed this week and cite the rows behind each finding.

The outcome it is designed for

Advisors reach students in the first weeks of trouble with the evidence in hand, and leadership sees which courses and cohorts need support before midterm grades post.

The concepts behind it

BuildMyIQ

Student Early-Alert Caseload

The advisor's working view: students ranked by alert tier, the lesson, submission and instructor-flag evidence behind each alert, and every outreach step from the first nudge to a logged conversation.

Works with FluidGrids, BigConsole

FluidGrids

Visual Decision Rules

The versioned rule builder, shown here on a loan example, with condition blocks, outcomes and a sample-input test. The same builder is designed to hold the early-alert tree and test it on sample students before it goes live.

Challenge 2 of 6

Feedback that keeps pace without eating teachers' evenings

The problem

Sunday, 8:40 pm. A ninth-grade English teacher at a partner high school has 142 argumentative essays across six sections and has promised feedback by Thursday. Her planning period was taken twice last week, once by coverage duty and once by a PLC meeting that ran long, so grading has moved to evenings again. Across town, a university writing instructor with four sections of first-year composition is in the same position. Both are typing the same comment about thesis statements for the fortieth time. Their chairs sense the team is stretched but have nothing to show except anecdotes, and nobody wants a tool that watches teachers.

What it costs

Feedback arrives too late to shape the next draft, planning time erodes quietly, and experienced teachers burn out or leave, taking years of craft with them.

How the products work together

BuildMyIQ puts every submission in one grading queue, auto-grades objective items and is designed to draft scores and comments on open answers for the teacher to review, edit or reject before anything is returned. Feedback due dates and submission counts from BuildMyIQ are designed to feed TimeCampus, which helps each teacher reserve protected grading blocks and shows them their own after-hours pattern, privately. The department chair sees only aggregate data: how much planning time the team actually kept, how many meetings landed in planning periods, and a workload signal when after-hours grading stays high, with a concrete suggestion such as moving a committee meeting. No one sees an individual teacher's day.

The outcome it is designed for

Students get feedback while it can still shape the next draft, teachers win back planning time, and chairs bring evidence rather than anecdotes to scheduling decisions.

The concepts behind it

The problem

Welcome Week ended three weeks ago. The orientation groups were lively for five days, then the student-run group chats went quiet, and one had to be shut down after a stream of insults no one on staff could see. Commuter and transfer students, who leave campus when class ends, say they still do not know anyone in their major. Peer mentors each keep a spreadsheet and a separate messaging app, with no way to tell which groups are fading. Orientation events ran in yet another tool, so no one can say who actually showed up.

What it costs

A sense of belonging is hard to rebuild once a student has started to drift, and unmoderated side channels leave staff blind to harm they are expected to address.

How the products work together

When orientation groups run as sections or cohorts of the first-year seminar in BuildMyIQ, those rosters are designed to seed one ComradeCircle circle per group, each with a named peer mentor and channels for announcements, rides and study buddies. ComradeCircle's moderation triage is designed to give a first-pass verdict on posts and comments that a staff moderator can overturn, so the space stays welcoming as it grows. When a group goes quiet, its mentor is designed to see a specific suggestion, such as a between-classes lunch for commuters, and approves it before anything is sent. Approved meetups and Welcome Week sessions run as EventfullyManaged events, so RSVPs and QR check-in live on one record the mentor can see.

The outcome it is designed for

Every first-year, commuter and transfer student has a moderated place to belong from the first week, and mentors know which groups need a nudge while it still helps.

The concepts behind it

ComradeCircle

First-Year Cohort Circles and Peer Mentors

A circle for every orientation group, seeded from BuildMyIQ seminar rosters, with peer mentors, Welcome Week check-ins from EventfullyManaged and mentor-approved suggestions for quiet groups.

Works with BuildMyIQ, EventfullyManaged

Challenge 4 of 6

Answering registration-week questions without the long hold queue

The problem

Spring registration opens Monday. The one-stop enrollment office has four staff on the phones and the queue is already long. Most calls are the same handful of questions: why is there a hold on my account, when is the last day to withdraw, will dropping this class affect my financial aid, how do I order a transcript. The answers are in the catalog and the aid handbook, but those run to hundreds of pages, and a chatbot the university piloted once gave a confident answer that was a year out of date. Students who cannot get through by Friday miss the sections they need.

What it costs

Staff spend peak weeks repeating policy instead of handling cases that need judgment, and a wrong answer about withdrawal or aid can cost a student money or standing.

How the products work together

Botlit is designed to run a student services assistant grounded only in the institution's own catalog, aid handbook and registrar FAQs. Every answer shows the passages it used, and when nothing matches it says so and offers a person instead of guessing. The assistant is designed to check a student's record in BuildMyIQ under that student's own permissions, such as enrollment status and registered sections, while hold status is designed to arrive from the registrar's system through a FluidGrids request. When a question needs action, Botlit starts a FluidGrids workflow, for example an advising-hold review or a transcript request, with a named owner and an approval step, and staff follow every run, retry it or approve it from one list. Aid appeals and personal circumstances are routed to staff, not answered by the bot.

The outcome it is designed for

Routine policy questions get correct, cited answers at any hour, requests reach the right office with context attached, and staff time goes to students who need a person.

The concepts behind it

Botlit

Student Services Answer Desk

The registration-week desk: cited answers from the catalog and aid handbook, a BuildMyIQ enrollment check, hold status via a FluidGrids request, clear handoff rules, and the request each conversation started.

Works with FluidGrids, BuildMyIQ

The problem

Demo day for the continuing-education full-stack bootcamp is two weeks away. Twenty-eight learners have shipped capstones, but their evidence is scattered: practice scores on one site, a hackathon result in a slide deck, a certificate PDF that only proves they attended. The career coach is tracking employer RSVPs in a spreadsheet, booth assignments in an email thread and interview requests in her inbox. Two hiring partners have already asked the same question: which of these learners can actually do the work, and how would we know?

What it costs

Without credible proof of skill, strong career changers get screened out, hiring partners stop coming back, and the program struggles to show that it leads to real jobs.

How the products work together

TechnoSpam keeps each learner's work on one record: runnable practice problems with test-case verdicts, team hackathon submissions and scores, and verifiable certificates tied to completed work rather than seat time. EventfullyManaged runs demo day and its employer showcase as one event, and the same record carries into the spring career fair: employer registration, booths, capstone showcase slots, QR check-in and interview scheduling. For learners who opt in to share their profile, its employer view is designed to show their verified TechnoSpam certificates and hackathon results beside a suggested match, so a hiring partner books interviews from evidence instead of resume keywords. Degree students who complete BuildMyIQ courses are designed to carry their BuildMyIQ certificates onto the same employer cards. Interview bookings and employer notes stay on the EventfullyManaged event record, where the career coach reviews them before the next cohort starts.

The outcome it is designed for

Hiring partners meet learners with checkable evidence in hand, the career coach runs demo day from one record, and the program can show employers what its graduates can build.

The concepts behind it

Challenge 6 of 6

Protecting study focus and rest in exam season

The problem

It is 1:50 am in the second week of midterms. A sophomore has three exams in four days, twelve browser tabs open and a group chat that will not stop buzzing. She has been in the library since dinner and has read the same page on conditional probability four times. Her plan was to review in short sessions, but between work shifts and messages she has not had an unbroken hour all week. The university sends wellness emails, but nothing helps her plan the next three days, and she would never install anything that reports her habits to the school.

What it costs

Cramming through the night erodes the sleep and focus that studying depends on, and tools that feel like monitoring get switched off by the very students they are meant to help.

How the products work together

TimeCampus gives the student a private focus timer with structured intervals and breaks, on her laptop and her phone, and shows her own pattern: when she studies well and how much of her week slid into late-night sessions. Students use only the focus timer; automatic capture stays off unless a student chooses to turn it on, and nothing is shared with the institution. Exam dates and course modules from BuildMyIQ are designed to inform the focus sessions she plans, and when she is stuck, the BuildMyIQ tutor is designed to give a step-by-step hint grounded in the lesson rather than an answer, so a question at two in the morning does not become a two-hour spiral. TimeCampus suggestions are designed to encourage rest, never more output. It is not a counseling tool; the institution chooses which campus support resources it points to.

The outcome it is designed for

Students plan exam weeks in focused sessions with room for rest, get unstuck without an all-nighter, and trust a tool that reports to them rather than about them.

The concepts behind it

How it fits together

How the products work together across a term

Follow one term at a university that also runs a coding bootcamp. Each step is one product doing one job, and each hand-off names the product it goes to; some steps end one thread before the next starts another. FluidGrids feeding BigConsole and Botlit starting FluidGrids runs are documented integrations; the rest show how the products are designed to work together.

  1. To FluidGrids: Lesson inactivity, missed submissions, grade drops and instructor flags are designed to reach FluidGrids as early-alert events.

  2. To BigConsole: Every alert and its outcome is written to a datasink that feeds the retention console.

  3. To FluidGrids: Requests such as an advising-hold review or a transcript request start as FluidGrids runs with a named owner and an approval step.

  4. To EventfullyManaged: Mentor-approved meetups, such as a between-classes lunch for commuters, are designed to become events with RSVPs and QR check-in.

  5. To EventfullyManaged: For learners who opt in, verified certificates and hackathon results are designed to appear on their employer-facing student cards.

Step 1 of 8: Learning signals

Products in this solution

What each product brings

  • BuildMyIQ

    Learning record: LMS, SIS, tutoring and grading

    BuildMyIQ holds enrollments, cohorts, per-lesson progress, submissions, grades and certificates on one record, which is where early alerts, grading windows and cohort rosters begin.

  • FluidGrids

    Early-alert rules and request workflows

    FluidGrids keeps alert logic as versioned, testable rules, sends nudges, routes follow-up and runs the requests the student services desk starts, and its datasinks feed BigConsole.

  • BigConsole

    Retention console for leadership

    BigConsole turns alert and outcome data into a live console by course, cohort and program, and is designed to add an Explain panel that cites the data behind every finding.

  • Botlit

    Student services answer desk

    Botlit agents answer from the institution's own catalog and policies with citations, say so when nothing matches, and can trigger FluidGrids workflows for requests.

    Visit BotlitAll concepts
  • ComradeCircle

    Orientation circles and peer mentors

    ComradeCircle gives each first-year, commuter or transfer group a moderated circle with channels, polls, events and health signals that mentors act on.

  • EventfullyManaged

    Welcome Week, career fair and demo day

    EventfullyManaged runs registration, QR check-in, employer booths and leads, matchmaking and showcase agendas for campus events on one record.

  • TechnoSpam

    Bootcamp practice and proof of skill

    TechnoSpam pairs runnable lessons with practice problems, mentorship, team hackathons and verifiable certificates tied to real completed work rather than seat time.

  • TimeCampus

    Private focus and aggregate workload

    TimeCampus gives students a private focus timer and pattern view, and gives chairs aggregate planning and meeting load, with no screenshots or keystroke logging.

One platform underneath: Burdenoff Workspaces

All eight products run on Burdenoff Workspaces: one sign-in for students, faculty and staff, role-based access that decides who sees which student data, one audit trail across every action, and one bill, so an institution adds capabilities without adding another silo.

Concept gallery

Every concept in this solution

15 concepts from 8 products. Each one links to its own page on the product's website, and every view has a link you can share.

Pitch kit

The Education solution in one minute

Your institution already has the signals: a student who stopped opening lessons, a department grading at midnight, a first-year group that went quiet, a bootcamp graduate who can prove real skill. Burdenoff brings BuildMyIQ, the learning record, together with FluidGrids, BigConsole, Botlit, ComradeCircle, EventfullyManaged, TechnoSpam and TimeCampus, designed so each signal reaches the person who can act, with privacy and human judgment built in.

  • Early alerts with evidence: BuildMyIQ signals, FluidGrids rules and a BigConsole retention console, designed to reach advisors before midterms.
  • Faster feedback and protected planning time: AI-assisted grading in BuildMyIQ and aggregate-only workload views in TimeCampus.
  • Belonging by design: ComradeCircle circles for every orientation group, with peer mentors and EventfullyManaged events.
  • Registration-week answers from your own policies: Botlit cites its sources and starts FluidGrids requests with a named owner.
  • Proof of skill for bootcamps: TechnoSpam certificates and hackathon results beside every student at an EventfullyManaged demo day.
Email it

Questions

Frequently asked

Do we have to replace our LMS or student information system to start?

No. BuildMyIQ is designed to be both an LMS and a student information system on one record, and it is the fullest version of this solution, but several pieces can start on their own: Botlit answering from your catalog and handbooks, ComradeCircle for orientation circles, EventfullyManaged for career fairs, TimeCampus for focus. FluidGrids is designed to connect to systems you already run through its connectors. A good first step is one use case that stands alone, such as the Botlit registration-week desk or orientation circles; early alerts can follow, starting from BuildMyIQ or from a FluidGrids connection designed to read your current LMS.

Is this student or teacher surveillance?

The design intent is the opposite. TimeCampus does not take screenshots or log keystrokes, keeps each person's timeline private to them, and gives leaders aggregate views only. Early-alert signals in BuildMyIQ are visible only to the roles your institution permits, every action lands in one audit trail, and suggestions from moderation or circle-health agents wait for a person to approve them.

How is AI kept in check when learners include minors?

AI in this solution drafts and suggests; people decide. The BuildMyIQ tutor answers from the lesson and gives hints rather than answers, and AI-drafted grades are reviewed by the teacher before anything is returned. Botlit answers only from your knowledge bases, shows its sources and hands off when nothing matches or a topic needs a person. BuildMyIQ's design holds minors' data to a higher bar, with privacy-by-design handling of consent, retention, access and deletion.

Can a bootcamp or continuing-education unit use this without the rest of the university?

Yes. TechnoSpam covers runnable courses, practice problems, mentorship, hackathons and verifiable certificates, and EventfullyManaged runs demo day and employer events. Each workspace is isolated, so a bootcamp can start on its own and connect to the wider institution later without re-platforming.

Which of these connections are documented, and which are designed?

All products share one identity, permissions model and audit trail through Burdenoff Workspaces. FluidGrids datasinks feeding BigConsole, and Botlit agents querying dashboards and triggering workflows, are documented integrations. The other hand-offs on this page, such as cohort rosters seeding circles or grading windows shaping focus blocks, describe how the products are designed to work together and would be scoped with you.

Are these products available now?

All of the products on this page are pre-launch or early, and this page is a solution concept rather than a description of a live deployment. They do not claim certifications they have not attained. The team can walk you through what exists today and how a pilot for your institution would be sequenced.

Related domains

All domains

Want to explore this for your organization?

Tell us about your setup. We will walk you through the products involved and scope a pilot around the challenge that hurts most.

This is a solution concept: it shows how Burdenoff products are designed to work together in this industry. The images are illustrations of the concepts, not screenshots of the actual products, and every name and figure in them is sample data.